printable version PDF version

Blacklists -- the Second Phase of the ‘Fake News’ Strategy to Stifle Truth
by claire Sunday, Nov 27 2016, 11:21pm
international / prose / post

Status Quo rag the Washington Post, known for its pandering to the elite CFR, has recently published a disgraceful -- from all journalistic perspectives -- piece listing over 200 so-called ‘fake news’ sites. Clearly, the only mirrors available to WP staff are in the lavatories, an appropriate location in this instance.

It seems that few people are aware of this neo-McCarthyist strategy to suppress alternative news sites, which generally have far more credibility than mainstream propaganda outlets that pass for ‘news’ mediums. However, prior to debunking these futile attempts at suppression it would serve readers well to understand some basics of the digital communications revolution, which, as the ‘fake news strategy’ advertises, has ruling elites truly alarmed -- they are losing their grip on crowd/perception management modes of operation, which of course results in greater public awareness, something dreaded by nefarious ruling elites, as their very lives are threatened.

Digital technology/communication is a two-edged sword, it lends itself to outrageous intrusions and loss of privacy, but it also allows every citizen the right to free speech and expression, notwithstanding one has to be careful regarding identities. Huge attempts have been made, at great expense to the elites, to harness and control the internet, including backgrounding certain sites deemed ‘anti’ by algorithms in popular search engines and a host of other stifling methods, all of which have clearly failed, in fact, they have assisted alternative sites gain favour as their existence is suppressed and once people become aware of these sites they flock to them simply due to the fact that these sites attempt to relay accurate news, not propaganda/distractions, which mainstream sites specialise in.

Opposing opinions almost always backed by verifiable links and sources are refreshing for those on mass media drip-feeds, and so the alternative media gains in popularity as each day passes, while the mass media is seen for what it is, an odious, undisguised source of lies, fake news and vile propaganda.

The panic now evident among media moguls and other CFR members is palpable, however, they have created the circumstances (mis/disinformation saturation) that have propelled alternative news sites to the status they enjoy today as credible sources of REAL news.

When dealing with today’s ruling elite it pays to understand the nature of the beast, perhaps its most critical failing is it's aversion to history; Joe McCarthy though destroying numerous careers in the media industry, ended his career (as a useful idiot) in total disgrace as people became aware that he was a stooge for homosexual J Edgar Hoover (FBI director) and other elite interests that wished to rid Hollywood of what they considered to be anti-capitalist forces. I would add that sackings were legion, BUT most talented writers were able to continue making a living via shadow writers that remained in the industry, an industry that couldn’t do without extremely talented writers. Today locating server platforms around the globe makes it impossible to eradicate alternative sites, Google has already failed with its suppression algorithms.

So if McCarthyism failed the first time what hope has it got the second time? None, is the short and sweet answer. Any real attempt to suppress popular sites, would attract a mountain of publicity and as advertising experts know, there is no such thing as bad publicity, an accurate adage proven correct by Trump -- and WE, as a de-centralised force fighting for Truth and Freedom, are far more capable and wily than Trump and his advisors.

So, far from feeling intimidated, I would say as I’m sure others in my field would say, give it your best shot you mass murdering nefarious bastards, as we only stand to gain from any draconian attempt to suppress free expression or smear the reputations of credible journalists in the alternative media.

In conclusion, a little free advice to elites; you would do much better reading history than listening to mutually mesmerising, echo-chamber think-tanks but then how would invited ‘experts’ justify the huge sums they demand, of course think-tanks produce perverse results, glaringly evident today simply because people are paid huge sums, which of course tend to create 'favourable,' biased results. You see where your blood money gets you in the end, a life threatening dreamworld.

http://tinyurl.com/jrtxxo4