God May be a Poof
by joyce Sunday, Dec 31 2017, 8:11pm
international /
prose /
post
As usual we see in the sensationalist section of the mass media that they have purportedly found Noah’s Ark for the umpteen time -- LOL -- now considering that Jonah lived in a whale, probably with en-suite, one can only wonder at imbecilic religionists that have replaced personal responsibility for their lives with some idiot fantasy, or perverse myth at best. Now if we address the issue from extant texts of the Abrahamic tradition, God is male, father, or father-son etc -- interesting that no mention of any female God is found in the three major Abrahamic traditions, though of course humans are purportedly made in God’s image, which would indicate a hermaphrodite creator. Well, of course there is a reason behind misogyny, male dominance, patriarchy; female phobia became the new trend after thousands of years of female/fertility/nature worship, which was far more respectful of nature and the ecosystem, LIFE -- and far more sustainable than the “subdue the earth” bullshit of the perverse patriarchs, the results we see today is massive disruption of climate, insect and animal kills, and the poisoning of the ecosystem, well done, ‘BOYS!’
However, the Abrahamic religions continue to insist, based on their perverse texts, written by men of course, that a female God does not exist in their tradition and therefore females must be subject to males -- utter crap if gender is viewed rationally.
So, with the image comes genitals, so God has a cock and cunt, or just a cock according to the incomplete rendering of Jews, Muslims and Christians. Now what could you do with only a cock and no complimentary cunt which is designed to receive a cock among other important functions like birth? Not a great deal but masturbate or shove it in an orifice not meant for the purpose, the mind boggles, nevertheless male poop pushing these days is considered socially acceptable, again this type of behaviour could be traced to the female phobic Abrahamic religions, plain to see.
So we either have a incestuous poof God fucking his son or a chronic wanker Deity -- a very poor show indeed.
The loathing of the female in all three major religious texts of the Abrahamic tradition is undeniable, and people wonder about the origins of misogyny! Now girls, do not mistake the power of the feminine with emulating inadequate males and their occupations, capice? As doing this defers to imposed male dominance; no woman need emulate any MALE.
Happy new year
Perhaps it is also worth assessing the etymology of the word, “CUNT,” which is derived from FEMALE deity appellations, as in the Gita, Arjuna was the son of 'Kunti', stands to reason. But here’s a section taken from the parent site which emphasises the point or should I say, crevice?:
"Terence Meaden suggests that legal suppression of 'cunt' constituted "a series of vicious witch hunts encouraged by an evil establishment wishing to suppress what amounted to apparent signs of Goddess beliefs" (1992), and, indeed, there was a Japanese Goddess 'Cunda', a Korean Goddess 'Quani' (the Tasmanian 'quani' means 'woman'), a Phoenician priestess 'Qudshu', a Sumerian priestess 'Quadasha', and, in India, a Goddess known variously as 'Cunti-Devi', 'Cunti', 'Kun', 'Kunda', 'Kundah', and 'Kunti', worshipped by the 'Kundas' or 'Kuntahs'. These names all indicate that 'cunt' and its ancient equivalents were used as titles of respect rather than as insults (as does the Egyptian term, 'quefen-t', used by Ptah-Hotep when addressing a Goddess).”
It amuses me no end that even females today are offended by the word cunt, well girls, ignorance is weakness and knowledge is power, most of you are completely unaware how socialised you are by male patriarchy/ideology. There is nothing demeaning about the word CUNT, and fuck perverse, as proven, social (male) conventions.
<< back to stories
|