Bitcoin FEVER and the Engineered Cryptocurrency Trap
by ben Tuesday, Dec 5 2017, 4:14am
international /
prose /
post
The Crypto Con
The stupendous rise of Bitcoin’s value, which has recently breached the $10,000/unit ‘barrier’ has not been accidental or is the result of natural organic factors, which do not require a MASSIVE mass media push/SELL. Indeed, one cannot read the financial section of any mass media rag without tripping over Bitcoin trading hysteria and that occurrence alone should alert the experienced and aware. First we know that the mass media is owned by vested financial interests and has all the integrity of a $1 whore, proven since 9/11 and the illegal Iraq invasion, so anyone that allows themselves to be swept along by this propaganda and lying apparatus, good luck, because you’ll need it, though I have never and do not underestimate the nefarious power of the mass media on the unaware, unenlightened masses.
Now consider that the obvious push/sell of Bitcoin is pervasive in the mass media, again an indicator of a staged and planned sell considering its (media’s) concentrated and elite ownership, but to what end as Bitcoin fever does APPEAR to be a spontaneous eruption, which phenomenon upon consideration of the known, clearly is NOT a natural organic occurrence, it is here argued that it’s all planned, the hype and huge push of Bitcoin, but to what end/design?
A clear textual trail exists indicating that Major mainstream Central Banks of the world wish to introduce cryptocurrencies and a cashless financial system which would allow for total financial control, one click on a keyboard could effectively ruin and bankrupt any entity rendering all plastic cards and other tradeable mediums void -- think of that power allure for a moment.
Cryptocurrencies are nothing more than electrons, even though people imagine they own such currencies, and I am not ignoring Blockchain technologies which are purported to ensure security, but as a former IT consultant I know that anything that exists on the digital internet is vulnerable, as indeed has been proven with the hack of Bitcoin’s ‘secure’ digital wallets, by a Kazak group, as proof of my statement.
However, the temptation for total CENTRALISED currency control far outweighs any existing dangers, as no other medium exists today which allows for such complete financial/social control -- this also happens to be the wet dream of financial elites, which continue to have HUGE problems with CASH trading as cash allows for underground economies impervious to taxation and regulatory government bodies/control; however. cryptocurrency solves this problem and many more but effectively enslaves entire populations in the process.
Nevertheless, cryptocurrencies are and would always be vulnerable to hackers, but elite interests are willing to take the risk for reasons given. However, never forget that these future currencies are nothing more than electrons and patterns on a screen, for example, have you ever tried to buy a house or an apple with Bitcoins, it can’t be done unless you convert these electrons into a tradeable currency today. However, Major Banks would allow cryptocurrency trading via plastic and other mediums of THEIR centralised cryptocurrencies, and that should hint at the next point I would make.
We should know that Bitcoin is a decentralised (democratic) currency and major banks wish to implement centralised cryptocurrencies, so what better way to compromise a competing Bitcoin than to whip up investment fervor, allow for huge trading gains on Forex and then pull the plug on it by massive orchestrated selling by the major investors and guess who they are! Which would in effect destroy confidence in democratic Bitcoin.
Vested banking interests would then extol the virtues of 'SAFE,' CENTRALISED (supported by banks in other words) cryptocurrencies and implement their use after populations have become accustomed to the digital medium of exchange, this scenario is entirely feasible and from additional insider (my peers) information, a highly likely prospect -- vested interests could not allow for competing decentralised cryptocurrency to be favoured, otherwise their plan for total financial and social control would not eventuate.
In fact numerous friends actively working in the IT industry, some of which I have trained, are already in the employ of major banks and have prepared bank cryptocurrencies for release. Never, forget the technology employed has existed for over a decade, it only lacked social familiarisation and confidence to implement, so introduce and push the Trojan Bitcoin for that purpose but also ensure it fails as a decentralised currency and Bob’s your enslaved uncle.
For the unenlightened and unaware, I could guarantee the plug will be pulled on Bitcoin and banks would utilise its ‘collapse’ to deploy their own (‘safe’) cryptocurrencies, but have no idea when the plug would be pulled, as I do not attend elite gatherings. However, everything else stated is verifiable, particularly the information supplied in the embedded link.
I know it all sounds like a conspiracy, because it is -- the facts speak for themselves and if some research is applied the veracity of the above claim could be easily verified. Beware of the crypto con. The plug will be pulled on Bitcoin to open the way for 'safe' centralised BANK cryptocurrencies, that is assured.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/hopes-and-nightmares-over-crypto-currencies-and-the-bitcoin/5621623
<< back to stories
|