Manchester and London Attackers ALL KNOWN to Police
by jess Tuesday, Jun 6 2017, 5:52am
international / prose / post

Which fact highlights an obvious reality, the surveillance/police State is clearly unable to prevent terrorist attacks! So, does this proven reality, now substantiated in the UK, USA, France, Australia, etc, justify the excuse agencies and governments universally use -- “keeping us safe?” Clearly not, western societies world-wide are now able to offer incontrovertible proof that pan-surveillance and socially oppressive government policies, i.e., the removal of traditional freedoms and liberties, do NOT keep us safe. In other words governments, police and agencies should keep their INCOMPETENT noses out of our personal business.

Overseen targeted surveillance is of course necessary but to default to universal or pan surveillance is NOT WARRANTED. STATE attacks on Personal privacy -- which is a fundamental and ESSENTIAL FREEDOM, MUST BE REJECTED at ALL TIMES and I thank the State and regulatory institutions for proving my point that pan-surveillance is both ineffective and unnecessary.

Government liars and inept regulatory agents seem to have difficulty locating their dicks to take a piss -- and when they do, they’re not quite sure whether to take a piss or not -- give the pan-surveilled western world a break.

The above rational deductions anyone could make given the gross failures now evident in everyone’s face. Pan or non-targeted surveillance, is clearly unnecessary, as is stripping the public of their hard-won freedoms and liberties, which our fathers fought and died to maintain. No society should tolerate ANY measures that assault our inalienable rights and freedoms -- the foremost being the right to PRIVACY.